How far was the royal commission 1832 and the poor law amendment act 1834 a turning point in the provision of welfare for the poor?

I am going to assess the extent to which the royal representation and 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act was a crook channelise in the provision of the welfare for the abject. To begin with I am going to look at what it was like in the beginning 1834. I am going to look at the onetime(a) myopic law, the functional of the old poor law and how jackpot were helped under it. The 1601 Elizabethan Poor Law divided the poor into two congregations: foremost there was the impotent poor - the sick, antique and those unable to encounter - who were to be helped via outdoor respite or in almshouses. These people were classed as people whom would work scarce couldnt- the deserving poor . Secondly there were a group whom were the able-bodied paupers and it was image that these people could work but wouldnt -the ugly poor . They were gravely beaten until they realized they were in the wrong. quietus was given in some different ways, and not entirely parishes had a poorhouse. It currently became obvious that some parishes were to a greater extent sympathetic towards the poor in certain parishes, and so this caused many paupers to move from the parishes to ones in which were more generous.

To prevent this from accident again parliament passed the 1662 Settlement Act: This state that a soul had to have a settlement in prescribe to obtain relief from a parish. But these settlement laws caused problems as it hindered the free exertion of labour, it prevented men from leaving overpopulated parishes in lookup of! work, from these settlement laws it meant that many men that might live in a parish for 25 years, working on short contracts, and they would quiet not be eligible for poor relief ulterior on. These settlement laws... If you need to get a full essay, position it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay